|
John (or Patrick) Henderson
Abt 1680 - 17??
A circumstantial case can be created to suggest that our eldest
known Henderson ancestor was called John Henderson, resident in the small village of Airntully, in the Perthshire parish of
Kinclaven, and that he would have been born in the late 17th century, in approximately 1680. He would have been Calum's and
Jamie's great great great great great great great great great grandfather.
The established church records for the parish of Kinclaven in Perthshire
begin in 1726, with Ebenezer Erskine's Secession Church not taking hold in the parish until 1737. This is fortunate
for us, as our earliest confirmed ancestor is Patrick Henderson, who married Janet Young in February 1726. Their son
John was duly baptised in the parish in November 1726, which means he must have been the first born son. It is known from
subsequent generations that the family were strong adherents to the Scottish naming pattern, and from this it would seem that
Patrick's father was also called John, the eldest son being named after the father's father.
Further evidence that would seem to support this comes from the fact that
there was another Henderson family resident in Airntully (Scots Gaelic 'earann tulaich', meaning 'share of the hillock') at
the same time. The village was extremely small, with about 80 small huts along the main road to Caputh. Even by 1846, Samuel
Lewis recorded only 159 inhabitants for the village in his entry in the Topographical Dictionary of Scotland. In 1736,
a Thomas Henderson had a son called Patrick, followed by a John in 1738. It has been impossible to find who Thomas married
and when, but it may be that Patrick was not his first son, and that he may have had an earlier son called John who died in
infancy. This is just speculation, but the fact that both Patrick and John senior had two children each called John and Patrick,
and in such a small village area, would seem to suggest that the two elder men were in fact brothers.
Little can be concluded about John's life in Kinclaven, save that it would have been tied to the land
through agricultural work on the huge estate in possession of the Drummond-Stewarts. During his existence though, John would
have witnessed a major incident, the secession of the parish church to join with the dissenting Associate Presbytery in 1737.
From the Original Secession Magazine (Vol. 1, 1852-1854, p.409-410, Google Books):
The Secession Church, at the very period of its commencement, obtained
a strong hold in the parish of Kinclaven. In no other part of Scotland did the people more readily and cordially follow their
pastor, than in that parish; and this, not merely from love to him, but from attachment to the truths and principles,
for the maintenance of which the Rev. Mr Fisher, then minister of the parish, was honoured to appear.
Fisher was subsequently deposed by the Church of Scotland, but a measure of the loyalty to him by
the locals is further recorded in the same article:
Isabella McGregor, the cousin of Mr Watson, was one of those who, on account
of deafness, sat on the pulpit stair in Kinclaven parish church. One Sabbath, shortly after Mr Fisher had been deposed, a
stranger minister was proceeding to occupy the pulpit, when Isabella (having the large scarlet cloak common at that period
over her head), rose up and opposed his getting access to it. She declared her determination that, so long as she could resist
it, no hireling should enter there, and that before any one would, her body should be as red as her cloak; and she carried
her point, and compelled the stranger to withdraw.
We know that later generations of Hendersons were members of this church (one even became a minister),
but it is not known whether they went with the initial exodus of members from the established church. The fact that the established
church recorded some births for the family may have been as much the fact that they felt it their duty to record all births
in the parish as it may be that the children were actually baptised as Church of Scotland adherents.
Children of John HENDERSON and UNKNOWN:
Patrick Henderson
b: abt 1700
This Patrick is our earliest confirmed ancestor, and was Calum's and Jamie's great great great
great great great great great grandfather - see below.
Thomas Henderson
b: 17??
This Thomas resided in Airntully, Kinclaven, and had at least two sons:
Children of Thomas HENDERSON and UNKNOWN:
Patrick Henderson
b: Jan 1736
From the OPR for Kinclaven (OPR 365/0010 0019
Kinclaven):
Feb 1st
Patrick Son to Thomas Henderson in Airntilly aslo Joan Daughter to John
Sprunt in newbigging also [?] Daughter to Alexander Young in Drum were all Baptized
John Henderson
b: Jan 1738
John was born in Kinclaven and baptised on January 10th 1738 in
the parish.

Patrick Henderson
1??? - 17??
Patrick was Calum's and Jamie's great great great great great great
great great grandfather.
Little is known of Patrick's life at present. On January 25th 1726 he married
Janet Young in Kinclaven parish, Perthshire, with the OPR record as follows (OPR:365/10/247):
January 25th 1726
Patrick Henderson and Janet Young being regularly proclaimed were married.
Patrick and Janet are known to have had at least one son,
though as the birth record cannot be found, it is assumed that this generation of the family were dissenters, as is known
to be the case in later generations.
CHILDREN of PATRICK HENDERSON and JANET
YOUNG:
Andrew Henderson
b: 17?? d: 1???
Andrew was Calum's and Jamie's great great great great
great great great grandfather - see below.
John
Henderson
b.
Aug 1736
John was born in Kinclaven in August 1736 (OPR:
365/00)
August 1st
1736
John, son to Patrick
Henderson in the Mill of Airntully was bap.

Andrew Henderson
17?? - ????
Andrew was Calum's and Jamie's great great
great great great great great grandfather.
Andrew is believed to have been born in the parish
of Kinclaven in Perthshire, Scotland, though his birth record is not to be found in the established Church of Scotland records,
implying that he may well have been of a dissenting family.
Little is known of
Andrew, except to say that he married Jean Bennet at some stage prior to 1755, and that the couple
set up home in Kinclaven, where they had six children.
(NB: There is also a listed marriage between an Andrew Henderson and
a Jean Bennet in Dalgety, Fife, in 1764, but this is not the same couple).
CHILDREN of ANDREW HENDERSON and JEAN BENNET:
(1) Peter Henderson
b: 2/11/1755
Peter was Calum's and Jamie's great great great
great great great grandfather - see below.
(2) William Henderson
c: 24/6/1758
William was born in Kinclaven, Perthshire.
Henderson - William, son to Andrew
Henderson & Jean Bennet Airntulley (sic) was baptized 24th June 1758.
(3) James Henderson
b: 24/5/1761
James was born in Kinclaven, Perthshire.
Henderson - James son to Andrew
Henderson & Jean Bennet Airntully was born the 21th & Baptized the 24th of May 1761.
It is presumed that James died in infancy.
(4) John Henderson
c: 21/8/1763
John was born in Kinclaven, Perthshire.
Henderson - John son to Andrew
Henderson & Jean Benet in Airntully was born August 12th & baptized 21th 1765.
It is believed that John may have married Margaret Miller in 1786. If so, the
following is the OPR record for the banns prior to the event, from the Kinclaven register:
HENDERSON & MILLER John
Henderson and Margaret Miller both in this parish were regularly proclaimed - John Scott.
(5) James Henderson
c: 15/4/1766
James was born in Kinclaven, Perthshire.
Henderson - James, Son to Andrew
Henderson and Jean Bennet in Airntully was born Aprile 15th and baptized 1766
(6) Jean Henderson
c: 18/6/1769
Jean was born in Kinclaven, Perthshire.
Henderson - Jean, Daughter to Andrew
Henderson and Jean Bennet in Airntully was born June 11 and Batized 18th 1769
It is believed that Jean married John Roger in 1793. The OPR
for Kinclaven records only one set of marriage banns for a Jean Henderson in Kinclaven:
ROGER & HENDERSON
John Roger and Jean Henderson both in this parish
were regularly proclaimed for Marriage December 15th
The couple had at least two children.
CHILDREN of JEAN HENDERSON and JOHN ROGER:
Margaret Roger
b: 22/10/1794
From the Kinclaven OPR:
Roger - Margaret daughter to John
Roger and his wife Jean Henderson in Dam of Taymount was born 22nd and baptised 26th Octr 1794.
George Rogie
b: 17/9/1798
From the Kinclaven OPR:
Rogie - George son to John
Rogie & Jean Henderson his wife in Dam of Muckarvie was born 17th Sept 1798 & baptized the Lord's Day after.

Patrick (Peter) Henderson
2/11/1755 - 18??
Patrick was Calum's great great great great
great great grandfather.
Patrick was born was presumably born in the parish
of Kinclaven in November 1755, and was most certainly baptised there on November 5th. From the surviving Associate Secession
records, the baptism as was recorded:
The Revd Mr Robert Carmichael Minister of the
Gospel at Coupar Angus baptized a child to the Revd Mr Alexr Blyth Minister of the Gospel in this Associate Congregation called
Kathrine-- and another this same day to Andrew Henderson in Kinclaven parish called Patrick
Patrick was more commonly known in daily life by the
name Peter, although records exist in which he is named both ways.
Patrick married Jannet Bruce at some stage prior to 1782, presumably in the parish of Kinclaven, Perthshire, although no record for
the wedding banns can be found, as the relevant Associate Secession Church records have not survived.
CHILDREN of PATRICK
HENDERSON and JANNET BRUCE:
(1) Andrew Henderson
b: 26/10/1782
Calum's and Jamie's geat great great great
great grandfather - see below.
_____________________________
(2) William Henderson
b: 25/1/1784 d: 13/10/1870
William was Calum's and Jamie's great great great great great great uncle.
William was born in Kinclaven, Perthshire, on January 25th 1784, and christened
a day later:
Henderson - William son to Peter
Henderson & Janet Bruce in Airntully was born on the 25 & bapized the 26 Jan 1784
In 1806, William started to train to become a physician, it is believed at
the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, graduating from there in 1809. He then attended the University of St. Andrew's
to get his doctorate, and achieved this in 1810, becoming William Henderson M.D.
What had driven William to a career in medicine was an ailment that had afflicted him greatly
as a young child in Kinclaven, and in his early adult life. William suffered chronic indigestion, and he believed that
a career in meicine could help him to try and find something that would help relieve his pain. He eventually created
a mixture which he patented as Henderson's Stomachic Elixir, from which he subsequently went on to earn
a vast fortune, it being so successfully taken up in Britain and the United States of America. The following advertisement
in the London Times, of February 2nd 1832, describes the product:
STOMACH COMPLAINTS
Dr. Henderson's Stomachic Vegetable Elixir
Having suffered severely from stomach complaints, Dr. Henderson was led
to turn his attention to the study of the subject. To the use of this medicine, when all others had failed, he and many others
are indebted for complete exemption from pain, and restoration to health. To those whose bowels are habitually slow, and require
the occasional use of laxatives, and for general family use, it has a decided advantage over all other medicines, inasmuch
as it is safe, pleasant to the taste, and will appease the stomach when nothing else will rest upon it, and never loses
its powers: the same quality always producing the same effect. It may also be mixed with food or drink of any kind, without
oppressing the stomach, or losing the salutary effect on the bowels. It has been tried in every possible variety of stomach
complaint, and found uniformly beneficial. Prepared by Dr. Henderson, Perth, whose name is subscribed in red ink on each outside
label, and sold by Messrs. Butler, chemists, Cheapside, corner of St. Paul's, London: Prince's Street, Edinburgh: Sackville
Street, Dublin: and their agents in the country: in half-pint bottles at 2s. 9d. and pints 4s. 6d.
How Henderson came to concoct this mixture is recalled in the introduction to the
second edition of his book "Plain Rules for Improving the Health of the Delicate, Preserving the Health of the Strong
and Prolonging the Life of All", published in 1856 (p.xvii - xx):
The sufferings which I endured from indigestion in
early life, turned my attention to the study of medicine; and notwithstanding the advantages I thus possessed, so imperfectly
were these complaints then understood, that it was only when they had reached the second stage, and began to react on the
stomach, that an accidental discovery led me to a knowledge of their true origin.
Fifty years ago, when I was studying medicine, almost
all the pains which were felt in the several parts of the human body were thought to have been occasioned by inflammation
in the several tissues. Such having been the conclusion as to the cause, the remedy was obvious, and the lancet was freely
used on all occasions when pain was the prevailing symptom. When free depletion failed to give relief, mercury wa shad recourse
to, with the intention of changing the action in the affected part. Such were the remedies in almost universal use for combating
the symptoms now known to proceed from indigestion. From the suffering I had all my life-time endured, and then laboured under,
it may well be supposed that I submitted to the established treatment cheerfully, and passed through the ordeal heroically.
It is true, I lost strength daily, but by and bye, my stomach gave me less uneasiness, and gradually, from loathing every
kind of food, my appetite became voracious.
Now that my stomach gave me but little trouble, I
thought all was right; but I did not then understand the cause, nor had I observed the curious fact that has been so often
familiar to me, that when the irritation proceeding from indigestion passes from the stomach and its immediate appendages,
and settles down on some special organ of the body, the annoyance in the stomach, for a time at least, passes from that viscous
to the organ that has now become the seat of the disease. This constitutes what I term the second stage of indigestion.
My complaint was now looked upon by the best authorities
as organic, and I was directed to have it treated accordingly. The excrutiating torture which I endured from the diseased
action in the parts, and the treatment to which I was subjected, was such as makes me, even at this distance of time, tremble
to think of.
After a few weeks, the irritability of stomach became
again so great, that it would retain neither food nor medicine.
I now, almost in despair, began a course of experiments
to endeavour to compound an aperient that would rest on the stomach, and, if possible, restore the natural action of the bowels.
After innumerable failures, I at length succeeded in compounding that aperient, from the use of which, I, and many thousands
of my suffering brethren, have derived so much benefit.
No one could have been more surprised than I was at
the effect of this medicine: as the bowels resumed their natural functions, my stomach gradually became soothed, the irritation
in the lower portion of the bowels slowly subsided, and I began to enjoy life again. The continued use of this medicine, combined
with some gentle tonics, in three months restored me to comfortable health, which, as far as these complaints are concerned,
I continue to enjoy.
It was by pondering over, and reasoning from these
facts, that I first arrived at the full conviction, that all the endless ills which flow from indigestion have their origin
in im,purity of the blood, - from the sluggish and vitiated manner in which the digestive organs supply the material for that
pabulum of life. Once satisfied of this fact, it has been the business of my professional life to follow it up; and this has
been the main cause of my success in the treatment of these complaints. This important fact is daily gaining ground, from
the rapid progress which chemical science is making, and the scarcely less brilliant light the microscope has thrown on the
physiology of the human body.
On August 31st 1812, William married a lady
by the name of Margaret Morison, daughter of merchant James Morison and Janet Blair.
The old parish register for Perth's Middle Church parish recorded the wedding:
August
1812
Perth the Twenty
ninth day of August One thousand eight hundred and twelve years ________________ Contracted
Dr. William
Henderson Ohysician in the Middle Church Parish of Perth and Miss Margaret Morrison in Saint Pauls Church Parish of Perth
Daughter to the Deceased Mr James Morrison late Merchant in Perth__________ Elder John Duncan.
The Persons
before named were regularly Proclaimed and Married the Thirty first day of August said year by the Reverend Mr William Aird
Thomson Minister of the Middle Church Parish Perth.
Margaret was something of an artist, and
it is evident from William's will that he had profound love for her, and a deep appreciation for her artistic abilities.
As one of the town's handful of physicians, William went on to have a quite extraordinary
career in Perth. One of the earliest known interests he had was in the disease smallpox, and in 1819, he published an article
called "Reported Cases of Small-pox, being the First Appearance of a Disease Epidemic after Discovery of a Vaccine".
In 1820, he further gained notoriety as
being the doctor who successfully delivered a baby by means of a casarean section. Although the procedure had been known to
have been carried out elsewhere in Scotland prior to this, only a handful of children had been known to survive
the procedure. The following account from the Perth Courier of October 5th 1820 describes what happened:
The Caesarean operation was performed here on
Saturday last, by Dr Henderson, in presence of six of his professional brethren. The patient being much deformed, and in a
reduced habit of body, survived the operation only about 24 hours. The child, a fine girl, is doing extremely well. We understand
that this is about the 24th time this operation has been performed in Great Britain, and that only one or two have survived
it. Of the 24 children, only 11 have been brought into the world alive. Much praise is due to the medical gentlemen who assisted
in this distressing case, two of them having constantly attended by turns on the patient, during the whole time she was alive.
And from the internet, a further description has also been found of the case,
the woman in question being a 30 year old lady with serious disability:
Despite being severely debilitated and
confined to bed for some years with increasing skeletal deformities, she became pregnant, and in due course laboured unsuccessfully
for about 102 hours. An elective caesarean section was performed, but she died some hours later, though her daughter survived
and was appropriately christened Caesar Anna. This represents one of the earliest cases in which the caesarean operation
was performed where the full obstetric history was carefully recorded by the obstetrician involved, Dr. Henderson of
Perth. The case was clearly considered important, and in 1836 engravings of this pelvis were used
to illustrate Professor Hamilton's "Practical Observations of Various Subjects Related to Midwifery". Such cases are now of great rarity in the developed
world.
William carefully recorded the progress of this particular case and in 1821 had the case published in
the Edinburgh Medical Journal, under the title of "A Case of Caesarean Section where the Child was Saved". (The article
has still to be sourced.)
On June 25th 1825, William, in his capacity as one of the elders at the East Parish
Church of Perth, recorded the contractual arrangements for the wedding of Ann Paton and Alexander MacKay. Ann was Calum's and Jamie's great great great great great great aunt, daughter
of William Paton and Christian Hay, their great great great great great grandparents.
Perhaps the biggest crisis that William faced in his role as a physician in Perth was the cholera
epidemic of 1832, which killed hundreds of the town's citizens:
Cholera.- In 1832, the Asiatic cholera visited Perth, as it did many other towns in Britain. As in the
visitation of the plague, the most effectual means that could be devised were adopted by the continued authorities to avert
or mitigate the malady. A meeting of the the influential classes of the community was called. The meeting divided the town
and suburbs into sections. To each of these a certain number of persosn was appointed, with authority to remove nuisances,
and cause the house which required it to be thoroughly cleansed and purified. A temporary hospital was fitted up to receive
patients; and competent medical officers were appointed to attend and take charge of them. A soup-kitchen was established,
from which the poor of the place were supplied daily with broth and bread. The consequence of these precautionary measures
was most beneficial. To them may be justly ascribed, under Heaven, the comparatively small number of cases that occurred.
The deaths were 147. It is proper to mention, that, through the liberality of certain noblemen and gentlemen in the county,
and of the inhabitants of the parish, no legal assessment was resorted to. The sum collected and expended was L.2091, 4s.
5d. (p.37).
As a part of the Medical Board for Perth during the crisis, William was one of the few physicians who
understood why the disease was communicating so easily through the populace, and was therefore able to put in place measures
that helped to defeat its transmission, thereby ending the epidemic.
William continued to be as inventive with other cases as he did his approach to his indigestion and the
caesarean operation. The following article, from the Lancet in 1841, gives a particluar example:
NEW AND SUCCESSFUL METHOD OF TREATING DISEASE OF THE PROSTATE GLAND.
By W. Henderson, M.D., Perth
On the 1st of June, 1840, a gentleman consulted me under the following circumastances. About
four years ago, he first felt a more frequent desire than usual to void urine, accompanied with more or less pain, and followed
with frequent slight mucus discahrge from the urethra. He was then in London, and the medical gentleman whom he consulted
treated the complaint as gonorrhoeal. He shortly after that left London, but, impressed with the idea of the alleged nature
of his disease, he continued to take all sorts of medicines, known and secret, without any abatement of his sufferings.
When I first saw him, he felt an almost constant desire to empty the bladder, often passing
only a few drops of urine at a time, accompanied with much pain and pressure; occasional severe lancinating pains
at the neck of the bladder, which extended throughout the urethra, and were most distressing at the point of the penis; priapisms
and emissions during sleep, followed with extreme heat and pain; constant mucus discharge from the urethra; bowels confined;
much uneasiness in passing the faeces; a sensation as if some hard substance were pressing from within against the verge of
the anus, which no effort to empty the bowel could remove. Sitting for any length of time on a hard seat causes a deep-seated,
heavy pain at the neck of the bladder; heat and excoflation at the verge of the anus on taking even moderate exercise on foot,
and he cannot ride on horseback at all from the pain it occasions.
On introducing a catheter, to ascertain whether stricture existed, the instrument passed freely
until it reached the prostate gland, where there was obstruction and much pain in passing it into the bladder. I then examined
the gland with the finger through the rectum; it was much enlarged, and painful on pressure.
The ordinary means, viz. aperients, iodine, leeches, and counter-irritants on the perineum, were
persevered with for four weeks, with scarcely any alleviation of the pateient's sufferings, and no progress whetever made
in reducing the size of the gland.
|
|
| Henderson's terror device!! |
While pondering on this most distressing case, it occurred to me , that if I could manage to
apply leeches upon the gland, through the rectum, they might have a good effect. Accordingly, I had a tube made of tin, a
quarter of an inch wide at one end, and half an ich wide at the other end, bent into the form here represented (see diag,
right). I then cut down the wide end of the tube about a third part of an inch, two-thirds of its diameter, in front,
corresponding with the bend, leaving the projection behind as a handle to enable me to guide the other end accurately, and
keep it steady after it had been properly applied. Having just had the bowel freely emptied, I cautiously introduced the tube,
so directed, that by pushing it up in a straight line, its mouth must pass over the centre of the right lobe (the tenderest
part) of the gland. As the tube advanced, I made gentle lateral pressure with its projecting point, at the distance of about
every line, until the patient experienced a sensation somewhat similar to that felt when the point of the finger was pressed
against the most sensible part of the gland. I then secured the tube gently, but steadily, with the left hand, and with the
right hand introduced a leech into it, which, I was not a little pleased to find, took readily. When this leech dropped off,
I changed the position of the tube, so as to place the mouth of it over the left lobe of the gland, and then introduced another
leech, which also took readily.
When the tube was withdrawn the blood accumulated in th rectum, and brought on a desire to evacuate
the bowel; this was frequently the case, but, from the feculent matter with which it was mixed, the exact quantity could not
be ascertained, but it was considerable. This application of the leeches was followed with great relief to the patient; the
priapisms and emissions by which he had been so long harassed and weakened entirely ceased, and all his other symptoms were
much mitigated. The aperients and iodine were continued. A week after the leeches were again applied, and acted equally well.
After this, the pressure on the sphincter ani, and desire to empty the bowel, were scarcely at all experienced; and the mucus
discharge from the urethra altogether disappeared. The only uneasiness which he now felt was the heat and lancinating pains
in the gland and urethra, particularly at the point of the penis, wheich were occasionally a little troublesome. Two days
after the last application of the leeches, I examined the gland with the finger, through the rectum; it was now greatly reduced
in size, and pressure upon it gave very little uneasiness. Six days afterwards, the heat and pains in the gland and urethra
being still occasionally felt, and attempt was again made to apply the leeches as formerly, which failed. When the tube
was withdrawn the cause of the failure was manifest, the introduced end of it being quite filled up with feculent matter.
Something had occurred to prevent the patient from taking his aperient at the usual time, and his bowels had not been properly
relieved. A similar occurrence was guarded against on the following day, when the leeches acted well. The relief which the
patient experienced was now so complete , that, except continuing the aperients and iodine, nothing more was done for two
weeks, when I again examined the gland. It had now decreased to about the natural size, but pressure on the right lobe still
gave a little uneasiness. On this part one leech was again applied, which acted well.
At the end of other two weeks, I again examined the gland, through the rectum, and a perceptible
degree of tenderness still remaining when pressure was made upon the right lobe, one leech was once more applied upon it,
which after a little manoeuvring, acted well.
From that time the patient has continued well, and was some time ago married to a lady to whom
he had long been attached.
|